Posts by stan livedeath

865

WoMD ... so where are they?

by Simon in

now, the war is over, the weapons were not used and of course have not been found.. how threatening could they be if they did not even use them when being invaded by a massive force (of the countries they hate)?!

perhaps, as many suspect, they didn't use them because they didn't have them?.

now we're being told that we'll have to be patient and give them time to find them.

stan livedeath

Baker, Malc,

The 1988 attack of chemical weapons in Iraq. Is not evidence that in 2003 Saddam had chemical weapons to use in the UK and US.

Chilcot reported that nothing was found after troops invaded in 2003.

Kate xx

but--facts;

Saddam did use weapons of mass destruction--chemicals

Saddam did launch ballistic missiles against Israel

ok--his rockets had a limited range at the time---and could not have reached the uk----but they certainly could hit Israel--with satan knows what payload on board. and Israel has a reputation of hitting back hard. easy to see one huge middle east conflict costing millions of lives.

20

Happy birthday to me

by azor in

jw
friends

i just turned 41 today.

last year was my first celebration at 40. half my life is lost to this cult and i celebrate by almost losing my job.

one of the only things i have left.

stan livedeath

Aah..sorry mate...we don't celebrate birthdays.

Oh wait...we do now.....happy birthday to yoooo

865

WoMD ... so where are they?

by Simon in

now, the war is over, the weapons were not used and of course have not been found.. how threatening could they be if they did not even use them when being invaded by a massive force (of the countries they hate)?!

perhaps, as many suspect, they didn't use them because they didn't have them?.

now we're being told that we'll have to be patient and give them time to find them.

stan livedeath

no chemical weapons ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_chemical_attack.

865

WoMD ... so where are they?

by Simon in

now, the war is over, the weapons were not used and of course have not been found.. how threatening could they be if they did not even use them when being invaded by a massive force (of the countries they hate)?!

perhaps, as many suspect, they didn't use them because they didn't have them?.

now we're being told that we'll have to be patient and give them time to find them.

stan livedeath

hmmmm

so--what would we say about Blair now if he had done nothing--and saddam had launched a chemical attack against Israel--who then responded with a nuclear strike against Baghdad ?

if i remember--saddam did launch his missiles against israel at the start of the first war--largely knocked down by american patriot missiles.

26

Governing Body Anthony Morris gives talk at convention. Child refuses blood dies

by Watchtower-Free in

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yxw_wxyviu .

stan livedeath

This would never happen in the UK. Judges overrule parents wishes on blood without hesitation.

yep--and i'm sure most jw parents here in the UK rely on that.

25

Beard's Coming to the Borg!

by DwainBowman in

wt sept study edition, page 17, paragraph 17!

.

stan livedeath

so its ok for sisters to have a beard and wear trousers then ?

406

ex-jw-uk

by bigmac in

jw
friends

i'm quite new to this site, & have realised some members have a union jack symbol under their avatar.

i don't.. could we have a "show of hands" from any uk members?

i've already found several by reading older posts..

stan livedeath

bumped for Gargamel.

12

Brighton Convention Being Discussed

by konceptual99 in

jw
friends

whilst browsing my local football team's fan forum, i spied this thread.... http://www.northstandchat.com/showthread.php?340338-10-000-expected-at-the-amex.